top of page

The Elephant in the Boardroom: Why Businesses Talk Operational Excellence But Rarely Master It

  • Writer: Brand Focus
    Brand Focus
  • Jul 25
  • 4 min read

Operational Excellence (OE). It’s a buzzword that echoes through boardrooms, fills strategic planning documents, and inspires countless consultancy pitches. Companies say they want it – the seamless processes, the waste reduction, the enhanced customer value, the competitive edge. They even invest in it, launching Lean initiatives, Six Sigma projects, and digital transformation programmes.

Yet, despite this widespread aspiration and effort, true, sustained Operational Excellence remains an elusive beast for so many. Why? Because while businesses often work on OE, they consistently fail to allocate the necessary budgets and, crucially, the long-term, unwavering commitment required to make it truly succeed. It’s the business equivalent of joining a gym with grand ambitions but only buying a one-month membership and never showing up after the first week.


Operational Excellence

1. The Short-Term Scramble: Sacrificing Marathon for Sprint

In today's fast-paced business landscape, the pressure for immediate results is relentless. Quarterly earnings, annual targets, and market expectations often overshadow long-term strategic investments. Operational Excellence, by its very nature, is a continuous journey, not a destination. It requires patient, persistent effort that may not yield dramatic, headline-grabbing returns in the first fiscal quarter.

When budget season rolls around, or when unforeseen challenges arise, OE initiatives are often the first to face cuts. They’re viewed as 'nice-to-haves' rather than foundational pillars, expendable in the face of more pressing, often short-sighted, priorities. This shortsightedness starves OE programmes of the consistent funding they need to embed cultural change, upskill staff, and refine processes over time.


2. Cost vs. Investment: A Fatal Misconception

Many organisations still perceive spending on Operational Excellence as a cost rather than a strategic investment. They see the immediate outlay for training, technology, or consulting fees, but struggle to quantify the long-term Return on Investment (ROI) in tangible terms.

True OE isn't about simply cutting costs; it's about building a capability for continuous improvement that drives sustainable growth, innovation, and customer loyalty. It reduces waste, yes, but also enhances quality, speeds up delivery, and frees up resources for higher-value activities. When these deeper benefits aren't understood or effectively communicated to the C-suite, OE initiatives are perpetually vulnerable to budget constraints.


3. The "Project" Mentality: Checking Boxes, Not Changing DNA

Operational Excellence is not a project with a start and end date. It's a fundamental shift in organisational DNA – a culture of continuous improvement, problem-solving, and waste elimination that permeates every level of the business.

However, many companies approach OE as a series of isolated projects: "We'll do a Lean Six Sigma training programme," or "Let's implement a new ERP system." Once the training is done, or the system is live, the initiative is declared a success, and the team moves on. Without embedding the principles into daily operations, rewarding continuous improvement, and establishing robust governance, these projects often fail to deliver lasting impact. They lack the long-term follow-through and sustainment mechanisms necessary for genuine transformation.


4. Leadership Buy-in: From Lip Service to Lived Reality

Every CEO will outwardly champion Operational Excellence. But true leadership buy-in goes beyond rhetorical support. It requires active participation, visible commitment, and consistent messaging. When leaders aren't seen actively championing OE, allocating resources appropriately, and holding themselves and others accountable for its success, the message quickly filters down the ranks: "This isn't truly important."

Furthermore, leadership resistance to changing deeply ingrained ways of working, or an unwillingness to invest in the necessary people and technology infrastructure, can quickly derail even the most promising initiatives. Fear of disrupting the status quo often trumps the ambition for excellence.


5. The Fear of True Transparency: Exposing Imperfections

Operational Excellence demands ruthless self-examination and transparency. It requires shining a light on inefficiencies, acknowledging problems, and sometimes admitting that current processes are suboptimal. For some businesses, particularly those with a blame culture, this level of transparency can be uncomfortable and even threatening.

Rather than embracing the opportunity to improve, some organisations shy away from exposing their imperfections, leading to a superficial engagement with OE principles that avoids tackling the root causes of inefficiency.


The Path Forward: Commitment, Not Just Conversation

For businesses to truly embrace Operational Excellence, they must shift their mindset. This means:

  • Strategic Budget Allocation: Treating OE as a fundamental, long-term investment, not a discretionary expense.

  • Cultural Transformation: Recognising that OE is about people and culture as much as processes and tools. It requires fostering a mindset of continuous learning and empowerment.

  • Sustained Leadership Engagement: Leaders must embody the principles of OE, championing it consistently and visibly, and providing the necessary resources for its long-term success.

  • A Holistic Vision: Moving beyond isolated projects to a comprehensive, integrated approach that sees OE as an ongoing journey woven into the fabric of the organisation.


The rewards of true Operational Excellence are profound: enhanced competitiveness, increased profitability, a more engaged workforce, and delighted customers. It's time for businesses to stop merely talking about OE and instead commit to the budget, the patience, and the profound cultural shift required to truly achieve it. The future of their success depends on it.

Comments


bottom of page